I
could explain my book rather easily. It is a suicide note written in
collaboration with the absent reader from an already dead author. The
book was a Schrodinger’s box, conscious reflection was the cat.
With a little blood, ink, emotion, and ritual; with reference to
music and sex and individuation and dance; it was clear to me the
book in its hyper-text appearance was a timeless representation of
the knowing subject as understood by Schopenhauer. I descended like
God and became the son in my book and allowed it to die on a cross of
rejection, strife and pure indifference. I now believe in the knowing
subject in perhaps an even more fundamental fashion.
That
explains the birth, life and death of the eschaton sequence. I would
not consider this a second coming. I do not have the will, intellect
or ambition to try and blow up the world with an AiIDS-like virus
that turned the text of computers my document touched to be
disconnected, freed from the hub, and put mercifully to sleep.
Only
the information in the mind of interpreters would be left.
And
to ensure the uncertainty of that interpretation I included a code so
unfathomably random – so random the author himself doesn’t know
whether by the process of having no process certain mock codes had
been reproduced, overly used, or plain repeated.
What
is the value of such a text? Well it at least served in part as a
reductio ad absurdum of certain deconstructionist principles. The
primacy of language and the spoken over the written word to name just
two examples. The second aim was a Romantic howl in pessimistic
tradition, with an existential bent based on the banal life of a
postgraduate father of two who was white and from an average working
family.
Somehow
I thought this level of engagement and commitment would save and
reward me.
I
am certainly not saved and I have not been rewarded. I have become a
member of the underclass on prescription drugs for a vile condition
which can only be described as people-mistrusto-phobia and
inner-space in a strange place-specific agoraphobia.
I
know for sure there are readers for me and that I will never reach
them. My books are not showy or flash, they are hardly fiction nor
fact, they consist in no plot, and there is no dialogue or
characterisation. Alongside poetry the least accessible art on the planet. Combined with my violent infantile streaks of painting, I
have hardly pitched myself towards popular, although the frustrating
thing is that even among the unlearned, the time-poor, and even the
unrefined, I have genuinely positive reactions as though I’m on to
something. If I could find a way to get things combined I could reach
a few more of the desperately lost.
If
only for the company of a fellow soul with his rational mind
consciously back to front: he knows like the wind-up toy he is pushed
from within, not pulled calmly in front from behind.
If
this act of mine serves as a commentary it is don’t be in haste,
when you write or read our previous book. It is hardly literal.
The
tyrannnical solipsist mode is the frustrated voice of a pointless
liberal.
I
do not believe in the right or the left but for the extent they
believe in people. I do not trust the masses one bit, but I am not
overly keen on the character or judgement of any individual.
I’m
about as political as the man who says we share or split the apple.
But it was pointed out to me that politics is really about who gets
to slice the apple.
The
wisdom of Solomon doesn’t work for more than two crying people.
In
common with the last sequences I have never been sat for such periods
of time immersed in intense writing. If for that and the flavour
alone, consequent on my sweat, I will have my voice met.
If
I am greeted at the last by my friend, by my reader – my end –
all the pain I have had, all the longing I’ve held, all the gult I
have owned, evrything I’ve done in the interest of letters, I will
be made happy.
If
I reach more than one fellow voice that I recognize as mine though it
comes from another, I will know my work on earth here was done.
There
is a long way to go before we can say that that has been done..
Perhaps
this early on it is better to fix our eyes and arrows at the moon and
not the glaring midday hot sun.
Of
her I am quite tidy. Respectful of her married life although I wasn’t
immediately: I felt used or shunned.
Although
it was I who had done the shunning. How I turned my back at the very
last instant of her coming here, returning.
And
all for the one I still love but in who loving hates me. At least
that is what it feels like. Jung said if you dance with two you will
leave with none.
I’ve
come to put it down to my subconscious, or my unconscious need for
freedom despite my ego crying for security and it would seem motherhood.
Where
does love go when it disappears? - of not all am I fond and then some
more than others. It is no different I guess with your affections
concerning friends: there is a sliding scale, a friendship spectrum,
and unusually it can be a single person at both ends.
I
can be read as an episode of manic depression on one of its
few-yearly jump springs: something in me wants out a project as good
as the last two even put together. And the eschaton sequences needed
some background, some kind of handle or insight. This much I am told.
Especially having removed the letter-long conceits and invented
preface stroke faux introduction. The author is still dying to be read.
Ultimately
the episode makes a change from lying in bed wishing you were dead or
wanting to be twenty years or so younger.
I
have to keep reminding myself how old I am for in truth I feel as
though I have immatured in some naive ways: of the forgiving heart, in
my soft generosity. But I have grown wisdom as well, I have learned
discipline to a certain extent, I have learned manners.
I
will share my last sandwich with you, you don’t even need to ask.
In fact you oughtn’t to ask for my sensitivity to my vulnerability
makes me resent your pushing an agenda on my free offering.
I
can barely bring myself to make profit, something in me revolts and
turns at the thought of making a play and gaining some advantage. I
don’t necessarily mind the great game I just do not believe that
everyone is playing with the same value currency.
You
cannot get more different than cats and dogs, certainly proverbially
so, but I had to observe each one respectively in each others’
presence andthey were alike as flies, forest ferns or flowers.
I
enjoy a reading but I loathe my voice. In this respect, in this
phenomenon, I am not alone. It has really made me think about how
people hear what is to me a fused cacaphony of voices, and explained
some behaviour which I might have thought ignorant before but now
blame on my cracked or monotone voices.
I
am forced to write right through the night, as I have explained
before, because the world elopes and leaves me with its essence, on
which I build my lattice lines and slopes.
I’m
so stoned that I am seeing bloody double. I don’t mind the doubling
up but the bleeding’s trouble.
I
cannot resist a rhyme unless it’s reducing the lovely lines to
inglorious babble. This would be an example.
I
may be a feminised man but I am still a man’s man. Somehow I
imagine all my readers to be men. Once I thought anyone, but
especially young men’ Now I expect not to be read at all except for by lonely old men.
My
problem was there wasn’t enough life for it to be ceremoniously
slain; it was never released, it was never published, it never came
from the clouds.
Perhaps
this time there’s a better hope of suicide, far better evidence to hand of
death by shop.
The
first born would also be killed over copyright issues. I included
many titles of many well known underplayed songs.
So
the will is only half the story, the other half is the late much
weaker consciousness and its forms of intellect. But this is where we
start from. Something screams to me that this is an unfinished story.


No comments:
Post a Comment